Arizona Law TV® is part of the Law TV® Network, a video driven legal directory that features quality educational videos from some of the state’s premier law firms.
The legal directory includes a comprehensive listing for each law firm, including how to reach the firm directly or on social media.
The complaint alleges the defendants are intentionally infringing on Subway's trademarks and operating their Sub Sub restaurant using Subway's...
Continue Reading
U.S. District Judge Allison D. Burroughs of the District of Massachusetts entered a default judgment in favor of Jumpsource, partially granting their...
Continue Reading
Chancellor Kathaleen McCormick of the Delaware Court of Chancery wrote in January that Tesla CEO Elon Musk "wields unusually expansive managerial...
Continue Reading
Cozen O'Connor is moving into Little Rock with the hire of a former Arkansas attorney general, while Faegre Drinker's hire arrives from Troutman...
Continue Reading
"This new clemency initiative is a cornerstone of our administration's efforts to make New Jersey the state of second chances," Gov. Phil Murphy said...
Continue Reading
Amazon cited a growing trend among attorneys to corner niche markets by suing specific corporations by gleaning inside knowledge through expansive...
Continue Reading
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom gave Penn Carey the endowed gift for the program in honor of Eric Friedman, a 1989 Penn Carey Law graduate who served as Skadden’s executive partner for 15 years before stepping down in April.
“This is the first time a university has negotiated with the students who’ve been pushed off campus by extreme protesters,” Jay Edelson said in an email to Law.com. “And the result we got makes clear what our priorities are: safety for students, and actually encouraging a dialogue rather than aimlessly hurling slogans at one another.” […]
While some judges appreciated Judge Kevin Newsom’s transparency in exploring generative AI in legal work, others thought his adventurousness was premature.
The Fifth Circuit said cases Mid Valley cited did not apply because Mid Valley’s circumstances did not impose affirmative obligations on the Levee Board.